Internet-Draft EST-C509 July 2026
Liao Expires 20 January 2027 [Page]
Workgroup:
Network Working Group
Internet-Draft:
draft-liao-ace-est-c509-03
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Author:
L. Liao
NIO

EST for C509 Certificates

Abstract

This document defines Enrollment over Secure Transport (EST) protocol operations over HTTPS and secure CoAP for use with C509 certificates. The operations specified in this document support CA certificate distribution, C509 certificate enrollment, C509 certificate re-enrollment, and server-side key generation using C509 certificates. This document also defines operations for Certificate Revocation List (CRL) distribution.

About This Document

This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liao-ace-est-c509/.

Discussion of this document takes place on the Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments Working Group mailing list (mailto:ace@ietf.org), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/. Subscribe at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace/.

Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/ace-wg/xxx.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 20 January 2027.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

Enrollment over Secure Transport (EST) [RFC7030] defines HTTPS-based operations for X.509 [RFC5280] certificate enrollment and CA certificate distribution. Payloads are DER-encoded and wrapped in CMS (Cryptographic Message Syntax, [RFC5652]) structures. C509 [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert] defines a compact, CBOR-encoded alternative to DER X.509 certificates. C509 certificates are substantially smaller.

Although C509 was developed with constrained devices in mind, its benefits extend to unconstrained devices operating over low-bandwidth links and to large-scale deployments. Smaller, CBOR-encoded certificates reduce bandwidth and storage requirements, accelerate TLS handshakes, and lower parsing and serialization overhead even on powerful endpoints; because C509 does not use ASN.1/DER, implementations can avoid complex ASN.1 parsing code, which reduces code size and complexity and lowers the attack surface for certificate parsing libraries. In complex systems (for example, connected cars) that contain diverse device classes—microcontrollers, sensor chips, and SoCs—using a common certificate format wherever practical simplifies integration and provisioning. Using C509 consistently across device classes simplifies provisioning, interoperability, and over-the-air updates, and can reduce overall operational costs and latency.

This document defines EST operations that carry C509 objects in place of DER X.509 objects, following the same secure transport and URI path structure as [RFC7030] and [RFC9148].

A key property of this design is that EST clients do not require a CBOR parser or generator:

This document uses C509CertificationRequest as defined in [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert] as the C509 Certificate Signing Request (C509 CSR) format. An EST client uses a C509 CSR to request issuance of a C509 certificate from an EST server.

The operations for EST over HTTPS used in this document are (those wit new marked are new operations defined in this document) in Figure 1, and for EST over CoAP in Figure 2.

+==========+===+=============+==============+===================+
| Opera-   | M | Description |  Request     | Response          |
| tion     | / |             |  Media Type  | Media Type        |
|          | O |             |              |                   |
+==========+===+=============+==============+===================+
| caps     | M | Capability  | (none)       | text/plain;       |
| (new)    |   | discovery   |              | charset=utf-8     |
+----------+---+-------------+--------------+-------------------+
| cacerts  | M | CA          | (none)       | - application/    |
|          |   | certificate |              |   cose-c509+cbor  |
|          |   | retrieval   |              | - application/    |
|          |   |             |              |   cose-c509+cbor, |
|          |   |             |              |   usage=chain     |
|          |   |             |              | - cose-c509-cert  |
|          |   |             |              |   +cbor           |
+----------+---+-------------+--------------+-------------------+
| crli     | O | CRL         | (none)       | application/      |
| (new)    |   | metadata    |              | c509-crlinfo+cbor |
|          |   | retrieval   |              |                   |
+----------+---+-------------+--------------+-------------------+
| crl      | O | CRL         | (none)       | application/      |
| (new)    |   | retrieval   |              | c509-crl+cbor     |
+----------+---+-------------+--------------+-------------------+
| csr      | O | CSR         | (none)       | application/      |
| attrs    |   | attributes  |              | cose-c509-        |
|          |   | retrieval   |              | crtemplate+cbor   |
+----------+---+-------------+--------------+-------------------+
| kemc     | O | KEM         | application/ | application/      |
| (new)    |   | challenge   | c509-pubkey  | c509-kemchall     |
|          |   | issuance    | +cbor        | +cbor             |
+----------+---+-------------+--------------+-------------------+
| simple   | M | Certificate | application/ | application/      |
| enroll   |   | enrollment  | cose-c509-   | cose-c509-        |
|          |   |             | pkcs10+cbor  | cert+cbor         |
+----------+---+-------------+--------------+-------------------+
| simple   | M | Certificate | application/ | application/      |
| reenroll |   | reenroll-   | cose-c509-   | cose-c509-        |
|          |   | ment        | pkcs10+cbor  | cert+cbor         |
+----------+---+-------------+--------------+-------------------+
| server   | O | Server-side | application/ | application/      |
| keygen   |   | key         | cose-c509-   | cose-c509-        |
|          |   | generation  | pkcs10+cbor  | pem+cbor          |
+----------+---+-------------+--------------+-------------------+
Figure 1: Operations for EST over CoAP/DTLS Used in This Document (M/O: MANDDATORY / OPTIONAL)
+===============+================+=====+==========+==========+
| EST over      | Corresponding  | M/O | Request  | Response |
| CoAP/DTLS     | EST over HTTPS |     | Content- | Content- |
| Operation     | Operation      |     | Format   | Format   |
+===============+================+=====+==========+==========+
| (Not Related) |                |     |          |          |
+---------------+----------------+-----+----------+----------+
| crts          | cacerts        | M   | (none)   | - TBD    |
|               |                |     |          | - TBD    |
|               |                |     |          | - TBD    |
+---------------+----------------+-----+----------+----------+
| crli (new)    | crli           | O   | (none)   | TBD      |
+---------------+----------------+-----+----------+----------+
| crl (new)     | crl            | O   | (none)   | TBD      |
+---------------+----------------+-----+----------+----------+
| attr          | csrattrs       | O   | (none)   | TBD      |
+---------------+----------------+-----+----------+----------+
| kemc (new)    | kemc           | O   | TBD      | TBD      |
+---------------+----------------+-----+----------+----------+
| sen           | simpleenroll   | M   | TBD      | TBD      |
+---------------+----------------+-----+----------+----------+
| sren          | simplereenroll | M   | TBD      | TBD      |
+---------------+----------------+-----+----------+----------+
| skc           | serverkeygen   | O   | TBD      | TBD      |
+---------------+----------------+-----+----------+----------+
Figure 2: Operations for EST over CoAP/DTLS Used in This Document (M/O: MANDDATORY / OPTIONAL)

2. Conventions and Definitions

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

The following terms are used in this document:

EST client:

The entity that contacts the EST server to obtain certificates or CA information, as defined in [RFC7030], Section 1.

EST server:

The entity that processes EST requests, typically acting as an RA between the EST client and the CA, as defined in [RFC7030], Section 1.

CA:

Certification Authority. The entity that issues C509 certificates.

C509 CSR:

C509 Certification Request. A CBOR-encoded certification request used by an EST client to request issuance of a C509 certificate.

PoP:

Proof of Possession. Verification that the requester holds the private key corresponding to the public key in the C509 CSR.

3. Protocol Design

3.1. Client Authentication

While [RFC7030] permits a number of the EST functions to be used without authentication, this document requires that the client MUST be authenticated for all functions, as in [RFC9148]. This document require the use of EST to support certificate-based client authentication only, neither HTTP Basic nor Digest authentication (as described in Section 3.2.3 of [RFC7030]) is supported, as in [RFC9148].

3.2. Discovery and URIs

In EST over HTTPS, the capabilities of EST server is retrieved by using the operation caps.

In EST over CoAP/DTLS, the capabilities is retrieved by sending a GET method to the EST server (as in Section 4.1 of [RFC9148]) (TODO: the TBD will be replaced with the real value once the Content-Formats are assigned in [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert] and [I-D.liao-cose-c509-revocation]). Linefeeds are included only for readability.

REQ: GET /.well-known/core?rt=ace.est*

RES: 2.05 Content
</est/crts>;rt="ace.est.crts";ct="TBD TBD TBD",
</est/sen>;rt="ace.est.sen";ct=TBD,
</est/sren>;rt="ace.est.sren";ct=TBD,
</est/att>;rt="ace.est.att";ct=TBD,
</est/skc>;rt="ace.est.skc";ct=TBD,
</est/crli>;rt="ace.est.crli";ct=TBD,
</est/crl>;rt="ace.est.crl";ct=TBD,
</est/kemc>;rt="ace.est.kemc";ct=TBD7

3.3. EST URL Structure and Path Components

The operations in this document follow the same URI path structure defined in [RFC7030], Section 3.2.2 for HTTPS and the corresponding secure CoAP mapping defined in [RFC9148]. Retrieval operations caps, cacerts / crts, csrattrs / att, crli, and crl use GET method.

Method: GET
Request target: /.well-known/est/<operation>
Request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/<operation>

Enrollment operations kemc, simpleenroll / sen, simplereenroll / sren, and serverkeygen / skc use HTTP POST or CoAP POST:

Method: POST
Request target: /.well-known/est/<operation>
Request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/<operation>

An EST server MUST return HTTP 405 / CoAP 4.05 (Method Not Allowed) if a client uses POST for a retrieval operation or GET for an enrollment operation.

The optional <label> path segment follows [RFC7030], Section 3.2.2 for HTTPS and the equivalent path structure in [RFC9148] for CoAP: an EST server MAY use an additional path segment before the operation name to distinguish services for multiple CAs and / or certificate profiles.

3.4. Channel Binding

Channel binding is OPTIONAL. The challel binding mechanisms specified in {RFC7030} and [RFC9148] apply.

3.5. Message Binding

The message binding mechanism specified in [RFC9148], Section 4.4 applies for CoAP in this document.

3.6. Message Fragmentation

The message fragmentation mechanism specified in [RFC9148], Section 4.6 applies for CoAP in this document.

3.7. Delayed Responses

The mechanism for delayed responses specified in [RFC9148], Section 4.7 applies for CoAP in this document. And the mechanism with retry-later for the operarions simpleenroll and simplereenroll specified in [RFC7030], Section 4.2.3 applies for HTTP in this document.

3.8. Response Cache

Successful responses, if will not be changed in the next short period, may include caching metadata:

  • For EST over HTTPS, EST servers SHOULD include ETag, Last-Modified, Cache-Control, and Expires headers.

  • For EST over secure CoAP, EST servers SHOULD include the options E-Tag and Max-Age.

3.9. CBOR Transfer

All POST request bodies in this document are CBOR-encoded. For HTTPS, CBOR-based response bodies are base64-encoded for transport. For CoAP, CBOR payloads are carried directly in the message body using the relevant CoAP Content-Format. The CBOR encoding MUST be deterministic as specified in Sections 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 of [RFC8949]. Servers MUST NOT include a Content-Transfer-Encoding header for CBOR payloads.

The media types used in this document are:

Table 1: Media Types Used in This Document
Media Type CoAP Content Format Structure Defined in
application/cose-c509-cert+cbor TBD C509Certificate [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert]
application/cose-c509+cbor TBD COSE_C509 [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert]
application/cose-c509+cbor;usage=chain TBD COSE_C509 [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert]
application/cose-c509-pkcs10+cbor TBD C509CertificationRequest [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert]
application/c509-pubkey+cbor TBD3 C509PublicKey this document
application/c509-kemchall+cbor TBD7 C509KemChall this document
application/cose-c509-crtemplate+cbor TBD C509CertificationRequestTemplate [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert]
application/cose-c509-pem+cbor TBD C509PEM (key + certificate) [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert]
application/c509-crl+cbor TBD C509CRL [I-D.liao-cose-c509-revocation]
application/c509-crlinfo+cbor TBD C509CRLInfo [I-D.liao-cose-c509-revocation]

The caps operation returns text/plain; charset=utf-8 with a list of capability keywords.

4. C509 Certification Request (C509 CSR)

A C509 CSR is a CBOR-encoded certification request used to request issuance of a C509 certificate. It is the C509 analogue of the PKCS#10 CSR [RFC2986] used in standard EST operations.

This document uses C509CertificationRequest as defined in [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert], Section 4. An EST client sends a C509 CSR to request certificate issuance or re-enrollment. The media type is application/cose-c509-pkcs10+cbor.

For server-side key generation requests (Section 8.4), the EST client does not possess the private key and does not know the public key that the EST server will generate. In this case, the subjectPublicKeyAlgorithm in TBSCertificationRequest MUST be set to the integer code for empty-publickey (see Section 4.1) and subjectPublicKey MUST be a zero-leght byte string (h''). Because no private/public key is available, no PoP signature can be computed/verified: the signatureAlgorithm MUST be set to the id-alg-unsigned integer code and signatureValue MUST be a zero-length byte string. EST servers MUST accept C509 CSRs using empty-publickey and id-alg-unsigned for serverkeygen / skc requests and MUST NOT verify a PoP signature in this case.

4.1. empty-publickey Algorithm

This document defines a new C509 public key algorithm, empty-publickey, to be used exclusively in C509 CSRs for serverkeygen / skc (server key generation) requests to indicate that no public key is available in the CSR.

The empty-publickey algorithm code (TBD1) MUST NOT appear in C509 certificates. It is only valid in the subjectPublicKeyAlgorithm field of TBSCertificationRequest when the corresponding subjectPublicKey is a zero-length byte string (h''). EST servers MUST reject any C509 CSR using empty-publickey in a simpleenroll / sen or simplereenroll / sren request.

4.2. CRAttribute C509ChangeSubjectName

The C509ChangeSubjectName for X.509 PKI is defined in [RFC6402]. The corresponding definition for C509 certification request is a CBOR-array consisting of a subject and a subjectAlt. At least one of subject and subjectAlt MUST NOT be null.

C509ChangeSubjectName = [
  subject     C509Name / null,
  subjectAlt  SubjectAltName / null
]

This CRAttribute MAY be included in a simplereenroll / sren request to change the Subject field and/or the SubjectAltName extension in the newly generated certificate.

4.3. Proof of Possession

simpleenroll / sen and simplereenroll / sren MUST verify the PoP signature in the C509 CSR before issuing a certificate. The serverkeygen / skc operation does not require PoP verification because the EST server generates the key pair itself.

4.3.1. C509PublicKey

A C509PublicKey contains a subject public key in the C509 encoding. It uses the same field types as TbsCertificate in [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert] and is defined as:

C509PublicKey = [
  subjectPublicKeyAlgorithm : AlgorithmIdentifier,
  subjectPublicKey          : Defined
]

The subjectPublicKeyAlgorithm field uses the full AlgorithmIdentifier encoding as defined in [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert], without limitation. The subjectPublicKey field uses the same encoding as in C509 certificates: for most algorithms it is a CBOR byte string, but for RSA public keys it is encoded as an array of two unwrapped CBOR unsigned bignums [~biguint, ~biguint] when the exponent is not 65537, as specified in [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert].

The media type of C509PublicKey is application/c509-pubkey+cbor (see Section 10.3.1); the corresponding CoAP Content-Format is defined in Section 10.4. The "magic number" is TBD2, using the reserved CBOR tag 55799 and Content-Format TBD3, as described in [RFC9277], Section 2.2.

4.3.2. Proof of Possession for KEM Private Keys

Some public-key algorithms are KEM-only (key-encapsulation mechanisms) and do not provide a signature operation suitable for the traditional PoP signature carried in a C509CertificationRequest. For CSRs whose subjectPublicKeyAlgorithm is a KEM algorithm, an EST server MUST obtain explicit proof that the requester holds the corresponding KEM private key. This document specifies an interactive KEM challenge–response PoP mechanism.

The recommended KEM PoP flow is:

  • Challenge issuance: Upon receipt of a KEM public key (C509PublicKey) in the kemc operation, an EST server returns a CBOR-encoded KEM challenge object (C509KemChall) with media type application/c509-kemchall+cbor.

C509KemChall = [
  keyId         : bstr,
  encapAlg      : int,
  encapsulation : bstr
]

The media type of C509KemChall is application/c509-kemchall+cbor (see Section 10.3.2); the corresponding CoAP Content-Format is defined in Section 10.4. The "magic number" is TBD6, using the reserved CBOR tag 55799 and Content-Format TBD7, as described in [RFC9277], Section 2.2.

In particular (TBD: check consistency with [NIST.SP.800-227]):

  • keyId is the SHA-256 fingerprint of the CBOR-encoded C509PublicKey,

  • encapAlg is the encapsulation algorithm (TBD: define a new registry or reuse a COSE algorithm), and

  • encapsulation is the KEM ciphertext produced by encapsulating a freshly generated one-time secret key K to the client's KEM public key.

The server MUST retain the challenge state (at least keyId, K, and the lifetime) for the duration of the challenge.

  • Client decapsulation and response: The client decapsulates encapsulation to recover the one-time secret key K. The client computes a MAC value over the TBSCertificationRequest with the key K. The client then submits a follow-up operation as usual.

  • Server verification: The server computes the keyId, retrieves the challenge state for that keyId, and verifies that the state is still within its validity period. The server then verifies the received MAC value against the TBSCertificationRequest. The server proceeds with certificate issuance as for signature-based PoP. If verification fails or the challenge has expired, the server MUST reject the request.

Implementations SHOULD use HMAC-SHA256 (with integer value TBD4) by default, unless constrained by the KEM's security requirements. Servers MUST enforce challenge timeouts and retry limits to mitigate replay and denial-of-service risks.

5. EST Operations for Server Capability Discovery

5.1. caps

This operation is only related to EST over HTTPS, but not to EST over CoAP/DTLS.

The caps operation allows an EST client to discover which C509-specific operations the EST server supports before invoking them. EST clients and EST servers MUST support caps.

5.1.1. Request

The EST client sends a GET request for the server's C509 capability list. No request body is sent.

Method: GET
HTTP request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/caps

5.1.2. Response

On success, the EST server returns a HTTP 200 response with:

  • Media type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

  • Body: A plain-text list of capability keywords, one keyword per line. The EST server MUST terminate each line with <CR><LF>. The EST client MUST be able to parse lines terminated by <CR><LF>, <CR>, or <LF>. Keywords are unquoted and case-insensitive.

The following keywords are defined. An EST server MUST include a keyword in the caps response if and only if it supports the corresponding operation.

Table 2: caps Keywords Defined in This Document
Keyword Description
cacerts EST server supports cacerts (Section 6.1)
crli EST server supports crli (Section 7.1)
crl EST server supports crl (Section 7.2)
csrattrs EST server supports csrattrs (Section 5.2)
kemc EST server supports kemc (Section 8.1)
simpleenroll EST server supports simpleenroll (Section 8.2)
simplereenroll EST server supports simplereenroll (Section 8.3)
serverkeygen EST server supports serverkeygen (Section 8.4)

An EST client that receives an error response to a caps request MUST NOT attempt the operations defined in this document.

Successful caps responses MAY include caching metadata as specified in Section 3.8.

Example response:

cacerts
crli
crl
csrattrs
kemc
simpleenroll
simplereenroll
serverkeygen

5.2. csrattrs / att

The csrattrs / att operation returns a C509CertificationRequestTemplate that an EST client MAY use to construct a C509 CSR.

5.2.1. Request

The EST client sends a GET request for the CSR template. No request body is sent.

Method: GET
HTTP Request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/csrattrs
CoAP Request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/attr

5.2.2. Response

On success, the EST server returns a HTTP 200 / CoAP 2.05 response with:

  • Media type: application/cose-c509-crtemplate+cbor (HTTP) / Content-Format TBD (CoAP)

  • Body: A C509CertificationRequestTemplate as defined in [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert].

An response code of HTTP 404 / CoAP 4.04 indicates that CSR attributes are not available.

Successful csrattrs / att responses MAY include caching metadata as specified in Section 3.8.

6. EST Operations for Distribution of CA Certificates

6.1. cacerts / crts

Successful cacerts / crts responses MAY include caching metadata as specified in Section 3.8.

Depending on the Accept option, the cacerts / crts operation returns different forms of the CA certificates (TODO: the TBD will be replaced with the real value once the Content-Formats are assigned in [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert] and [I-D.liao-cose-c509-revocation]):

  • Accept: application/cose-c509-cert (HTTP) / Accept=TBD (CoAP): C509Certificate (a single certificate)

  • Accept: application/cose-c509; usage=chain (HTTP) / Accept=TBD (CoAP): COSE_C509 (certificate chain)

  • No Accept or Accept: application/cose-c509 (HTTP) / Accept=TBD (CoAP): COSE_C509 (certificate set (unsorted certificates))

6.1.1. Request

The EST client sends a GET request for the CA certificate(s). No request body is sent. The Accept option specifies the expected Media-Type / Content-Formats of the response. If an Accept Option is not included in the request, the client is not expressing any preference and the server SHOULD choose format TBD for certificate set.

Method: GET

HTTP request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/cacerts
                     (Accept: <accepted media type>)
CoAP request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/crts
                     (Accept=<accepted Content-Format>)

6.1.2. Response

On success, the EST server returns a CoAP 2.05 response with:

  • For Request with Accept: application/cose-c509-cert+cbor (HTTP) / Accept=TBD (CoAP):

    • Media type: application/cose-c509-cert+cbor (HTTP) / Content-Format TBD (CoAP)

    • Body: A C509Certificate representing a single certificate.

  • For Request with Accept: application/cose-c509+cbor; usage=chain (HTTP) / Accept=TBD (CoAP):

    • Media type: application/cose-c509+cbor; usage=chain (HTTP) / Content-Format TBD (CoAP)

    • Body: A COSE_C509 representing an ordered certificate chain. The first element is the issuing CA certificate; subsequent elements are intermediate and root CA certificates in chain order.

  • For Request without Accept option or with Accept: application/cose-c509+cbor (HTTP) / Accept=TBD (CoAP):

    • Media type: application/cose-c509+cbor (HTTP) / Content-Format TBD (CoAP)

    • Body: A COSE_C509 representing an unordered certificate set. The first element is the issuing CA certificate; subsequent elements are not sorted. If a Root CA key update applies, the EST server SHOULD include the four "Root CA Key Update" certificates OldWithOld, OldWithNew, NewWithOld, and NewWithNew in the response chain. These are defined in [RFC9810], Section 4.4.

Successful cacerts / crts responses MAY include caching metadata as specified in Section 3.8.

7. EST Operations for Distribution of C509 CRLs

The crli and crl operations provide C509 CRL access. The C509 CRL format is defined in [I-D.liao-cose-c509-revocation].

7.1. crli

The crli operation returns metadata about the current C509 CRL for the target CA as a C509CRLInfo object without the full revocation list. This enables an EST client to check whether its locally cached CRL is still current before requesting the full crl. C509CRLInfo is defined in [I-D.liao-cose-c509-revocation].

7.1.1. Request

The EST client sends a GET request for CRL metadata. No request body is sent.

Method: GET
Request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/crli
Request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/crli
                [?crlnumber=<n>][&crldp=<dp>]

The optional crlnumber query parameter carries the decimal representation of the CRL number the client is interested in. When present, the EST server MUST return the C509CRLInfo for the CRL with that exact crlNumber. If no CRL with the requested crlnumber is available, the EST server MUST return HTTP status 404 (Not Found). When crlnumber is absent, the server returns the C509CRLInfo for the most recent CRL.

The optional crldp query parameter carries the CRL Distribution Point identifier. When present, the EST server MUST return the C509CRLInfo for the CRL associated with that distribution point. When both crlnumber and crldp are present, the server MUST return the C509CRLInfo matching both criteria.

7.1.2. Response

On success, the EST server returns a HTTP 200 / CoAP 2.05 response with:

C509CRLInfo carries all CRL fields from C509CRLInfoData — including crlType, signatureAlgorithm, authoritySubject, authorityKeyIdentifier, crlNumber, thisUpdate, nextUpdate, baseCrlNumber, and crlExtensions — without the revokedCertsList. An EST client can use these fields to compare crlNumber, nextUpdate, or compute a freshness check against its local cache before deciding whether to download the full C509CRL via crl.

If no matching CRL is available, the EST server MUST return HTTP 404 / CoAP 4.04 (Not Found).

Successful crli responses MAY include caching metadata as specified in Section 3.8.

7.2. crl

The crl operation returns the C509 CRL for the target CA.

7.2.1. Request

The EST client sends a GET request for the C509 CRL. No request body is sent.

Method: GET
Request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/crl
Request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/crl
                [?crlnumber=<n>][&crldp=<dp>]

The optional crlnumber query parameter carries the decimal representation of the CRL number. When present, the EST server MUST return the full C509CRL with that exact crlnumber. When crlnumber is absent, the server returns the most recent CRL.

The optional crldp query parameter carries the CRL Distribution Point identifier. When present, the EST server MUST return the full C509CRL for the CRL associated with that distribution point. When both crlnumber and crldp are present, the server MUST return the C509CRL matching both criteria.

If no matching CRL is available, the EST server MUST return HTTP 404 / CoAP 4.04 (Not Found).

7.2.2. Response

On success, the EST server returns a HTTP 200/ CoAP 2.05 response with:

If no matching CRL is available, the EST server MUST return HTTP 404 / CoAP 4.04 (Not Found).

Successful crl responses MAY include caching metadata as specified in Section 3.8.

8. EST Operations for Certificate Enrollment

8.1. kemc

The kemc operation requests a KEM-based Proof-of-Possession challenge for a submitted C509 public key whose subjectPublicKeyAlgorithm is a KEM algorithm.

8.1.1. Request

An authenticated EST client sends a POST request containing a C509PublicKey (Section 4.3.1) to request a KEM challenge.

Method: POST
Request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/kemc
Media type: application/c509-pubkey+cbor (HTTP)/ Content-Format TBD (CoAP)
Body: C509PublicKey

If the request does not contain a KEM public key, the EST server MUST return HTTP 400 / CoAP 4.00 (Bad Request). If the server supports KEM PoP for the submitted algorithm, it issues a challenge; otherwise, it MUST return HTTP 501 / CoAP 5.01 (Not Implemented).

8.1.2. Response

On success, the EST server returns a HTTP 200 / CoAP 2.05 response with:

  • Media type: application/c509-kemchall+cbor (HTTP) / Content-Format TBD7 (CoAP)

  • Body: A C509KemChall (Section 4.3.2).

A client that receives a C509KemChall uses the recovered one-time secret key to produce the PoP MAC and then proceeds with a normal enrollment request (simpleenroll / sen or simplereenroll / sren) including the computed MAC in the request (see Section 4.3.2 for the PoP flow). The EST server verifies the MAC using the stored challenge state and issues the certificate on success.

8.2. simpleenroll / sen

The simpleenroll / sen operation requests issuance of a new C509 certificate from the EST server.

8.2.1. Request

An authenticated EST client sends a POST request containing a C509 CSR (Section 4).

Method: POST
HTTP Request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/simpleenroll
CoAP Request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/sen
Media type: application/cose-c509-pkcs10+cbor (HTTP) / Content-Format TBD (CoAP)
Body: C509CertificationRequest

The C509CertificationRequest MUST include a valid PoP signature. The EST server MUST verify the PoP signature against the public key in the C509 CSR before issuing a certificate, as required by [RFC7030], Section 3.4.

8.2.2. Response

On success, the EST server returns a HTTP 200 / CoAP 2.05 response with:

  • Media type: application/cose-c509-cert+cbor (HTTP) / Content-Format TBD (CoAP)

  • Body: A C509Certificate issued for the subject in the C509 CSR, as defined in [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert].

8.3. simplereenroll / sren

The simplereenroll / sren operation renews or rekeys an existing C509 certificate.

8.3.1. Request

An authenticated EST client sends a POST request containing a C509 CSR for re-enrollment. The request Subject field and SubjectAltName extension MUST be identical to the corresponding fields in the certificate being renewed or rekeyed.

The C509ChangeSubjectName attribute defined in Section 4.2 MAY be included in the CSR to request that these fields be changed in the new certificate.

Method: POST
HTTP Request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/simplereenroll
CoAP Request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/sren
Media type: application/cose-c509-pkcs10+cbor (HTTP) / Content-Format TBD (CoAP)
Body: C509CertificationRequest

Re-enrollment processing follows [RFC7030], Section 4.2.2. The EST server MUST verify the PoP signature in the C509 CSR.

8.3.2. Response

On success, the EST server returns a HTTP 200 / CoAP 2.05 response with:

8.4. serverkeygen / skc

The serverkeygen / skc operation requests server-side key generation and returns the generated private key and the issued C509 certificate.

As discussed in [RFC9148], Section 9, transporting private keys generated by the EST server is inherently risky. The use of server-generated private keys increases the risk of digital identity theft. Therefore, implementations SHOULD NOT use EST functions that rely on server-generated private keys.

8.4.1. Request

An authenticated EST client sends a POST request containing a C509 CSR. The subjectPublicKeyAlgorithm in the C509 CSR SHOULD be set to empty-publickey (Section 4.1) and subjectPublicKey SHOULD be a zero-length byte string (h''), because the key pair is generated by the EST server. The signatureAlgorithm SHOULD be the id-alg-unsigned integer code and signatureValue SHOULD be a zero-length byte string. EST servers MUST accept C509 CSRs that use empty-publickey and id-alg-unsigned for serverkeygen / skc and MUST NOT verify a PoP signature in this case.

Method: POST
HTTP Request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/serverkeygen
CoAP Request target: /.well-known/est/<label>/skc
Media type: application/cose-c509-pkcs10+cbor (HTTP) / Content-Format TBD (CoAP)
Body: C509CertificationRequest

8.4.2. Response

On success, the EST server returns a HTTP 200 / CoAP 2.05 response with:

  • Media type: application/cose-c509-pem+cbor (HTTP) / Content-Format TBD (CoAP)

  • Body: A C509PEM.

The C509CertData field in the C509PEM MUST contain only the issued C509 certificate for the generated key pair.

The EST server SHOULD delete the private key from its storage as soon as the response has been transmitted successfully, unless the deployment policy requires retention for key escrow or disaster recovery (see Section 9). The private key is protected only by the TLS channel; no additional encryption is applied.

9. Security Considerations

The security requirements of [RFC7030] apply in full to all operations defined in this document.

9.1. Transport Security

All operations defined in this document MUST be carried out over HTTPS (HTTP over TLS) or secure CoAP (CoAP over DTLS) as required by [RFC7030], Section 3 and [RFC9148]. Implementations MUST NOT fall back to plain HTTP or unsecured CoAP.

EST clients and servers SHOULD use C509 certificates [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert] for TLS or DTLS authentication when both peers support C509. This enables end-to-end C509 usage, including the handshake itself, and reduces size and parsing overhead consistently. EST servers SHOULD continue to accept X.509 certificates [RFC5280] for TLS or DTLS client authentication for interoperability with clients that do not yet support C509.

9.1.1. TLS Certificate Type Negotiation

When C509 certificates are used for TLS authentication, the client and server negotiate the certificate type using the server_certificate_type and client_certificate_type TLS extensions as defined in [RFC7250].

9.1.2. Client Authentication

All operations MUST require client authentication.

9.2. Server Key Generation

The skc operation delivers a generated private key to the EST client over TLS. EST servers SHOULD delete the private key after successful transmission. EST clients MUST store the key material securely immediately upon receipt.

As discussed in [RFC9148], Section 9, transporting private keys generated by the EST server is inherently risky. The use of server-generated private keys increases the risk of digital identity theft. Therefore, implementations SHOULD NOT use EST functions that rely on server-generated private keys.

9.3. C509 Certificate Validation

EST clients MUST validate received C509 certificates against an independently configured trust anchor according to [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert]. The trust model for C509 certificates differs from classical X.509 certificate chain validation when C509 is used in the HyPKI trust architecture; in that case, validation uses the cosigner-signed Merkle tree or signed allowlist rather than a certificate chain.

10. IANA Considerations

10.1. C509 Public Key Algorithms Registry

IANA is requested to register the following entry in the "C509 Public Key Algorithms" registry under the registry group "CBOR Encoded X.509 (C509)" defined in [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert]:

Table 3: empty-publickey Registration
Field Value
Value TBD1
Name empty-publickey
Identifiers N/A
OID N/A
Parameters N/A
DER N/A
Comments Exclusively for use in subjectPublicKeyAlgorithm of a TBSCertificationRequest for server-side key generation (serverkeygen / skc). MUST NOT appear in C509 certificates.
Reference This document

10.2. C509 Signature Algorithms Registry

IANA is requested to register the following entry in the "C509 Signature Algorithms" registry under the registry group "CBOR Encoded X.509 (C509)" defined in [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert]:

Table 4: HMAC-SHA256 Registration
Field Value
Value TBD4
Name hmacWithSHA256
Identifiers id-hmacWithSHA256
OID 1.2.840.113549.2.9
Parameters N/A
OID 06 08 2A 86 48 86 F7 0D 02 09
Comments HMAC over SHA256
Reference This document

10.3. C509 CR Attributes Registry

IANA is requested to register the following entry in the "C509 CR Attributes" registry under the registry group "CBOR Encoded X.509 (C509)" defined in [I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert]:

+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Value | CR Attribute                                              |
+=======+===========================================================+
|  TBD5 | Name:            CMC Change Subject Name                  |
|       | Identifiers:     id-cmc-changeSubjectName                 |
|       | OID:             1.3.6.1.5.5.7.7.36                       |
|       | DER:             06 08 2B 06 01 05 05 07 07 24            |
|       | Comments:        RFC 6402                                 |
|       | attributeValue:  C509ChangeSubjectName                    |
+-------+-----------------------------------------------------------+

10.3.1. Media Type application/c509-pubkey+cbor

When the application/c509-pubkey+cbor media type is used, the payload is a C509PublicKey structure.

Type name: application

Subtype name: c509-pubkey+cbor

Required parameters: N/A

Optional parameters: N/A

Encoding considerations: binary

Security considerations: See the Security Considerations section of [[this document]].

Interoperability considerations: N/A

Published specification: [[this document]]

Applications that use this media type: Applications that employ C509 public keys.

Fragment identifier considerations: N/A

Additional information:

  • Deprecated alias names for this type: N/A

  • Magic number(s): TBD2

  • File extension(s): .c509

  • Macintosh file type code(s): N/A

Person & email address to contact for further information: iesg@ietf.org

Intended usage: COMMON

Restrictions on usage: N/A

Author: ACE WG

Change controller: IETF

10.3.2. Media Type application/c509-kemchall+cbor

When the application/c509-kemchall+cbor media type is used, the payload is a C509KemChall structure.

Type name: application

Subtype name: c509-kemchall+cbor

Required parameters: N/A

Optional parameters: N/A

Encoding considerations: binary

Security considerations: See the Security Considerations section of [[this document]].

Interoperability considerations: N/A

Published specification: [[this document]]

Applications that use this media type: Applications that employ C509 KEM challenges.

Fragment identifier considerations: N/A

Additional information:

  • Deprecated alias names for this type: N/A

  • Magic number(s): TBD6

  • File extension(s): .c509

  • Macintosh file type code(s): N/A

Person & email address to contact for further information: iesg@ietf.org

Intended usage: COMMON

Restrictions on usage: N/A

Author: ACE WG

Change controller: IETF

10.4. CoAP Content-Formats Registry

IANA is requested to add entries for application/c509-pubkey+cbor and application/c509-kemchall+cbor to the "CoAP Content-Formats" registry in the registry group "Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Parameters".

+----------------------+---------+-----------+-------+------------+
| Content              | Content | Media     | ID    | Reference  |
| Format               | Coding  | Type      |       |            |
+======================+=========+===========+=======+============+
| application/         | -       | [[link    | TBD3  | [[this     |
| c509-pubkey+cbor     |         | to x.y]]  |       | document]] |
+----------------------+---------+-----------+-------+------------+
| application/         | -       | [[link    | TBD7  | [[this     |
| c509-kemchall+cbor   |         | to x.y]]  |       | document]] |
+----------------------+---------+-----------+-------+------------+
Figure 3: CoAP Content-Format IDs

11. References

11.1. Normative References

[I-D.ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert]
Mattsson, J. P., Selander, G., Raza, S., Höglund, J., Furuhed, M., and L. Liao, "CBOR Encoded X.509 Certificates (C509 Certificates)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-20, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-20>.
[I-D.liao-cose-c509-revocation]
Liao, L., Tiloca, M., Höglund, J., Höglund, R., and S. Raza, "CBOR Encoded Certificate Revocation Management", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-liao-cose-c509-revocation-00, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-liao-cose-c509-revocation-00>.
[NIST.SP.800-227]
Alagic, G., Barker, E., Chen, L., Moody, D., Roginsky, A., Silberg, H., and N. Waller, "Recommendation for Key-Encapsulation Mechanisms", NIST Special Publication 800-227, , <https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-227>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC5280]
Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S., Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5280>.
[RFC5652]
Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", STD 70, RFC 5652, DOI 10.17487/RFC5652, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5652>.
[RFC6402]
Schaad, J., "Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) Updates", RFC 6402, DOI 10.17487/RFC6402, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6402>.
[RFC7030]
Pritikin, M., Ed., Yee, P., Ed., and D. Harkins, Ed., "Enrollment over Secure Transport", RFC 7030, DOI 10.17487/RFC7030, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7030>.
[RFC7250]
Wouters, P., Ed., Tschofenig, H., Ed., Gilmore, J., Weiler, S., and T. Kivinen, "Using Raw Public Keys in Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)", RFC 7250, DOI 10.17487/RFC7250, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7250>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
[RFC8949]
Bormann, C. and P. Hoffman, "Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)", STD 94, RFC 8949, DOI 10.17487/RFC8949, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8949>.
[RFC9148]
van der Stok, P., Kampanakis, P., Richardson, M., and S. Raza, "EST-coaps: Enrollment over Secure Transport with the Secure Constrained Application Protocol", RFC 9148, DOI 10.17487/RFC9148, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9148>.
[RFC9277]
Richardson, M. and C. Bormann, "On Stable Storage for Items in Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)", RFC 9277, DOI 10.17487/RFC9277, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9277>.
[RFC9810]
Brockhaus, H., von Oheimb, D., Ounsworth, M., and J. Gray, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure -- Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)", RFC 9810, DOI 10.17487/RFC9810, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9810>.

11.2. Informative References

[RFC2986]
Nystrom, M. and B. Kaliski, "PKCS #10: Certification Request Syntax Specification Version 1.7", RFC 2986, DOI 10.17487/RFC2986, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2986>.

Appendix A. Message Flow Diagrams of EST over HTTPS Operations

A.1. caps

EST Client EST Server Method: GET Request target: /.well-known/est/<p>/caps Status: 200 OK Media type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 <CR-LF seperated list of supported operations>
Figure 4: HTTP cacerts message flow

A.2. cacerts for single CA certificate

EST Client EST Server Method: GET Request target: /.well-known/est/<p>/cacerts Accept: application/cose-c509-cert Status: 200 OK Media type: application/cose-c509+cbor <Base64-encoded COSE_C509>
Figure 5: Message flow of EST over HTTPS operation cacerts for single CA certificate

A.3. cacerts for CA certificate set

EST Client EST Server Method: GET Request target: /.well-known/est/<p>/cacerts Status: 200 OK Media type: application/cose-c509+cbor <Base64-encoded COSE_C509>
Figure 6: Message flow of EST over HTTPS operation cacerts for CA certificate set

A.4. cacerts for CA certificate chain

EST Client EST Server Method: GET Request target: /.well-known/est/<p>/cacerts Accept: application/cose-c509; usage=chain Status: 200 OK Media type: application/cose-c509+cbor <Base64-encoded COSE_C509>
Figure 7: Message flow of EST over HTTPS cacerts for CA certificate chain

A.5. crli

EST Client EST Server Method: GET Request target: /.well-known/est/<p>/crli [?crlnumber=<n>][&crldp=<dp>] Status: 200 OK Media type: application/c509-crlinfo+cbor <Base64-encoded C509CRLInfo>
Figure 8: Message flow of EST over HTTPS operation crli

A.6. crl

EST Client EST Server Method: GET Request target: /.well-known/est/<p>/crl [?crlnumber=<n>][&crldp=<dp>] Status: 200 OK Media type: application/c509-crl+cbor <Base64-encoded C509CRL>
Figure 9: Message flow of EST over HTTPS operation crl

A.7. kemc

EST Client EST Server [TLS client certificate] Method: POST Request target: /.well-known/est/<p> kemc Media type: application/c509-pubkey cbor <Base64-encoded C509PublicKey> Status: 200 OK Media type: application/c509-kemchall+cbor <Base64-encoded C509KemChall>
Figure 10: Message flow of EST over HTTPS operation kemc

A.8. simpleenroll

EST Client EST Server [TLS client certificate] Method: POST Request target: /.well-known/est/<p> /simpleenroll Media type: application/cose-c509-pkcs10+cbor <Base64-encoded C509CertificationRequest> Verify PoP, Issue C509 cert Status: 200 OK Media type: application/cose-c509-cert+cbor <Base64-encoded C509Certificate>
Figure 11: Message flow of EST over HTTPS operation simpleenroll

A.9. simplereenroll

EST Client EST Server [TLS client certificate] Method: POST Request target: /.well-known/est/<p> /simplereenroll Media type: application/cose-c509-pkcs10+cbor <Base64-encoded C509CertificationRequest> Verify PoP, Issue C509 cert Status: 200 OK Media type: application/cose-c509-cert+cbor <Base64-encoded C509Certificate>
Figure 12: Message flow of EST over HTTPS operation simplereenroll

A.10. serverkeygen

EST Client EST Server [TLS client certificate] Method: POST Request target: /.well-known/est/<p> /serverkeygen Media type: application/cose-c509-pkcs10+cbor <CBOR C509 CSR (no pubkey)> Generate keypair, Issue C509 Status: 200 OK cert, Delete Media type: application/cose-c509-pem+cbor key from server <Base64-encoded C509PEM> (key no longer on EST server)
Figure 13: Message flow of EST over HTTPS operation serverkeygen

Appendix B. Message Flow Diagrams of EST over CoAP/DTLS Operations

B.1. cacerts for single CA certificate

EST Client EST Server GET example.com/est/<p>/cacerts (Accept: TBD) 2.05 Content (Content-Format: TBD) { payload with CBOR-encoded C509Certificate in binary format }
Figure 14: Message flow of EST over CoAP/DTLS operation cacerts for single CA certificate

B.2. cacerts for CA certificate set

EST Client EST Server Method: GET GET example.com/est/<p>/cacerts 2.05 Content (Content-Format: TBD) { payload with CBOR-encoded COSE_C509 (certificate set) in binary format }
Figure 15: Message flow of EST over CoAP/DTLS operation cacerts for CA certificate set

B.3. cacerts for CA certificate chain

EST Client EST Server GET example.com/est/<p>/cacerts (Accept: TBD) 2.05 Content (Content-Format: TBD) { payload with CBOR-encoded COSE_C509 (certificate chain) in binary format }
Figure 16: Message flow of EST over CoAP/DTLS operation cacerts for CA certificate chain

B.4. crli

EST Client EST Server GET example.com/est/<p>/crli 2.05 Content (Content-Format: TBD) { payload with CBOR-encoded C509CRLInfo in binary format }
Figure 17: Message flow of EST over CoAP/DTLS operation crli

B.5. crl

EST Client EST Server GET example.com/est/<p>/crl 2.05 Content (Content-Format: TBD) { payload with CBOR-encoded C509CRL in binary format }
Figure 18: Message flow of EST over CoAP/DTLS operation crl

B.6. kemc

EST Client EST Server POST example.com/est/<p>/kemc (Content-Format: TBD) { payload with CBOR-encoded C509PublicKey in binary format } 2.05 Content (Content-Format: TBD) { payload with CBOR-encoded C509KemChall in binary format }
Figure 19: Message flow of EST over CoAP/DTLS operation kemc

B.7. sen

EST Client EST Server POST example.com/est/<p>/sen (Content-Format: TBD) { payload with CBOR-encoded C509CertificationRequest in binary format } 2.05 Content (Content-Format: TBD) { payload with CBOR-encoded C509Certificate in binary format }
Figure 20: Message flow of EST over CoAP/DTLS operation sen

B.8. sren

EST Client EST Server POST example.com/est/<p>/sren (Content-Format: TBD) { payload with CBOR-encoded C509CertificationRequest in binary format } 2.05 Content (Content-Format: TBD) { payload with CBOR-encoded C509Certificate in binary format }
Figure 21: Message flow of EST over CoAP/DTLS operation sren

B.9. skc

EST Client EST Server POST example.com/est/<p>/skc (Content-Format: TBD) { payload with CBOR-encoded C509CertificationRequest in binary format } 2.05 Content (Content-Format: TBD) { payload with CBOR-encoded C509PEM in binary format }
Figure 22: Message flow of EST over CoAP/DTLS operation skc

Acknowledgements

The authors thank xxx for reviewing and commenting on intermediate versions of the draft.

Change log

Since draft-liao-ace-est-c509-02

  • Use both long name and short name of operations.

  • Add message flows for the cacerts / crts operation to retrieve single CA certificate, and CA certificate chain.

  • Add message flows for EST over CoAP/DTLS.

  • Editorial changes.

Since draft-liao-ace-est-c509-01

  • Add EST of C509 certificate over secure CoAP (updates [RFC9148]).

  • Use short operation names defined in [RFC9148] to replace the long names defined in [RFC7030].

Author's Address

Lijun Liao
NIO