Internet-Draft Destination-IP-Origin-AS Filter September 2026
Wang, et al. Expires 25 March 2027 [Page]
Workgroup:
IDR Working Group
Internet-Draft:
draft-wang-idr-flowspec-dip-origin-as-filter-14
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Authors:
H. Wang
Huawei
A. Wang
China Telecom
S. Zhuang
Huawei
Y. Huang
Huawei
T. Qin
Huawei

Destination-IP-Origin-AS Filter for BGP Flow Specification

Abstract

This document defines an extension to the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Flow Specification (FlowSpec) to enable filtering based on the Origin Autonomous System (AS) of the destination IP address. This extension is particularly useful in mitigating Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks or optimizing traffic redirection where the target IP addresses are numerous or rapidly changing, but belong to a specific destination Origin AS.

Requirements Language

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 25 March 2027.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

BGP [RFC4271] Flow Specification (FlowSpec), defined in [RFC8955] and [RFC8956], allows for the dissemination of traffic filtering rules. Current FlowSpec components support filtering by destination prefix, source prefix, and various Layer 4 parameters.

In certain DDoS mitigation and traffic engineering scenarios, an operator may need to apply rate-limiting, redirection, or filtering to traffic destined for a particular network (Autonomous System), even when the specific target IP prefixes within that AS are numerous or rapidly changing. Manually updating hundreds of prefix-based FlowSpec rules is inefficient and consumes significant Hardware Forwarding Information Base (FIB) / TCAM resources. This document introduces a new FlowSpec component that allows operators to use the Destination Origin AS as a matching criterion.

2. Definitions and Acronyms

3. Flow Specification Encoding for Destination-IP-Origin-AS Filter

This document proposes a new Flow Specification component type that is encoded in the BGP FlowSpec NLRI [RFC8955] [RFC8956].

Encoding: <type (1 octet), [op, value]+>

It contains a set of {operator, value} pairs used to match the Destination-IP-Origin-AS.

The operator byte (numeric_op) is encoded as specified in Section 4.2 of [RFC8955]:

    0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
  | e | a |  len  | 0 |lt |gt |eq |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
Figure 1: Numeric Operator (numeric_op)

Where:

The value field contains a 4-octet Autonomous System Number encoded in network byte order:

   0                   1                   2                   3
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
  +---------------------------------------------------------------+
  ~       Destination-IP-Origin-AS  (4 octets)                    ~
  +---------------------------------------------------------------+
Figure 2: Destination-IP-Origin-AS Value

3.1. Ordering of Components

As defined in [RFC8955], a strict ordering of components MUST be followed to ensure a deterministic comparison of FlowSpec NLRIs.

The Destination-IP-Origin-AS component (Type TBD1) MUST be ordered after Type 2 (Source Prefix) and before Type 3 (IP Protocol).

[Note to IANA: The exact numeric order will depend on the assigned Type value.]

3.2. Operational Procedures and Packet Matching Logic

When a BGP speaker receives and installs a FlowSpec route containing the Destination-IP-Origin-AS component, the matching process for a transit data packet MUST proceed as follows:

  1. The router extracts the packet's Destination IP address.

  2. The router performs a longest-prefix match (LPM) lookup for the Destination IP in its local BGP Loc-RIB / FIB to retrieve the associated active BGP route.

  3. The router evaluates the AS_PATH attribute of the retrieved BGP route:

    • The Origin AS is defined as the rightmost AS number in the AS_SEQUENCE segment of the AS_PATH.

    • If the AS_PATH ends with an AS_SET or AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE, the match fails unless all ASes in the set match, or the implementation supports evaluating each AS in the AS_SET against the filter.

  4. If the evaluated Origin AS matches the criterion in the FlowSpec rule, the packet matches this component.

  5. In multi-homing or multipath scenarios where a destination prefix is reachable via paths with different Origin ASes, the match MUST succeed if ANY valid active path to the destination prefix matches the Origin AS defined in the FlowSpec rule.

If a receiving BGP speaker cannot support this new component type, it MUST follow the error handling and component skipping procedures defined in [RFC8955] and [RFC8956].

4. Use Cases

This section describes a representative use case for traffic redirection and rate-limiting using the Destination-IP-Origin-AS filter.

Consider the topology shown in Figure 3. ISP AS64597 receives traffic from AS64596 (Source IP Prefix 61) destined for AS64598.

                         +---------+
                         | BGP FS  |
                         | Server  |
                         +----|----+
                              |
                              |
                              /
                             /
                ************/************  IP Prefix 81
                *          /            *  IP Prefix 82
  IP Prefix 61  *         / AS64597     *  IP Prefix 83
                *        /              *  IP Prefix 84
   +-------+    *  +---+/        +---+  *   +-------+
   +AS64596+-------+ R1+---------+ R2|------+AS64598+
   +-------+    *  +-+-+\        +---+  */  +-------+
                *        \         |\   /
                *         \        | \ /*  IP Prefix 91
                *          \       |  /\*  IP Prefix 92
                *           \      | /  \  IP Prefix 93
                *            \     |/   *\ IP Prefix 94
                *             \  +-+-+  * \ +-------+
                *              \-+ R3+------+AS64599+
                *                +---+  *   +-------+
                *                       *
                *************************

Figure 3: Traffic Redirection Using FlowSpec

Using traditional FlowSpec (RFC 8955), if AS64598 announces dozens or hundreds of individual prefixes (Prefix 81, 82, 83, 84...), AS64597 must inject separate FlowSpec rules for each destination prefix to redirect traffic coming from Source IP Prefix 61 towards Router R3:

+--------------+--------------+-------------------------+
| Destination  | Source Prefix| Action / Next-hop       |
| Prefix       |              |                         |
+--------------+--------------+-------------------------+
| IP Prefix 81 | IP Prefix 61 | Redirect to R3          |
| IP Prefix 82 | IP Prefix 61 | Redirect to R3          |
| IP Prefix 83 | IP Prefix 61 | Redirect to R3          |
| IP Prefix 84 | IP Prefix 61 | Redirect to R3          |
| ...          | ...          | ...                     |
+--------------+--------------+-------------------------+

Figure 4: Traditional Destination Prefix Matching

Using the extension defined in this draft, the BGP FlowSpec Server needs to generate only a single FlowSpec rule:

  +--------------+--------------+--------------------+
  | Destination  | Source Prefix| Action / Next-hop  |
  | IP Origin AS |              |                    |
  +--------------+--------------+--------------------+
  |  64598       | IP Prefix 61 |       R3           |
  +--------------+--------------+--------------------+

Figure 5: Destination-IP-Origin-AS Matching

This significantly reduces BGP NLRI messaging overhead, control plane churn, and hardware FIB/TCAM entry consumption on network elements.

5. Security Considerations

This document extends BGP FlowSpec. Security considerations discussed in [RFC8955] and [RFC8956] apply directly.

In addition, operators MUST consider the following:

6. IANA Considerations

IANA is requested to allocate a new component type in the "Flow Spec Component Types" registry defined in [RFC8955]:

+-------+-------------------------------+---------------+
| Type  | Description                   | Reference     |
+-------+-------------------------------+---------------+
| TBD1  | Destination-IP-Origin-AS      | This-Draft    |
+-------+-------------------------------+---------------+

7. Contributors

TBD

8. Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the review and inputs from Gang Yan, Robert Raszuk, Jeffray Haas, Linda Dunbar, Zhenbin Li, Rainbow Wu, Jie Dong and Ziqing Cao.

9. References

9.1. Normative References

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC4271]
Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8955]
Loibl, C., Hares, S., Raszuk, R., McPherson, D., and M. Bacher, "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules", RFC 8955, DOI 10.17487/RFC8955, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8955>.
[RFC8956]
Loibl, C., Ed., Raszuk, R., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules for IPv6", RFC 8956, DOI 10.17487/RFC8956, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8956>.

9.2. Informative References

[RFC6811]
Mohapatra, P., Scudder, J., Ward, D., Bush, R., and R. Austein, "BGP Prefix Origin Validation", RFC 6811, DOI 10.17487/RFC6811, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6811>.

Authors' Addresses

Haibo Wang
Huawei
156 Beiqing Road
Beijing
100095
P.R. China
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
Beiqijia Town, Changping District
Beijing
102209
P.R. China
Shunwan Zhuang
Huawei
156 Beiqing Road
Beijing
100095
P.R. China
Yang Huang
Huawei
156 Beiqing Road
Beijing
100095
P.R. China
Tao Qin
Huawei
156 Beiqing Road
Beijing
100095
P.R. China