Internet-Draft Source-IP-Origin-AS Filter September 2026
Wang, et al. Expires 25 March 2027 [Page]
Workgroup:
IDR Working Group
Internet-Draft:
draft-wang-idr-flowspec-sip-origin-as-filter-02
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Authors:
H. Wang
Huawei
A. Wang
China Telecom
S. Zhuang
Huawei
J. Dong
Huawei
Y. Huang
Huawei
T. Qin
Huawei

Source-IP-Origin-AS Filter for BGP Flow Specification

Abstract

This document defines an extension to the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Flow Specification (FlowSpec) to enable filtering based on the Origin Autonomous System (AS) of the source IP address. This extension is particularly useful in mitigating Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks where the source IP addresses are dynamic or numerous but belong to a specific source AS.

Requirements Language

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 25 March 2027.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

BGP [RFC4271] Flow Specification (FlowSpec), defined in [RFC8955] and [RFC8956], allows for the dissemination of traffic filtering rules. Current FlowSpec components support filtering by destination prefix, source prefix, and various Layer 4 parameters.

In certain DDoS mitigation scenarios, an operator may need to apply rate-limiting, redirection, or filtering to traffic sourced from a particular network (Autonomous System), even when the specific source IP prefixes within that AS are numerous or rapidly changing. Manually updating hundreds of prefix-based FlowSpec rules is inefficient and consumes excessive Hardware Forwarding Information Base (FIB) / TCAM resources. This document introduces a new FlowSpec component that allows operators to use the Source Origin AS as a matching criterion.

2. Definitions and Acronyms

3. Flow Specification Encoding for Source-IP-Origin-AS Filter

This document proposes a new Flow Specification component type that is encoded in the BGP FlowSpec NLRI [RFC8955] [RFC8956].

Encoding: <type (1 octet), [op, value]+>

It contains a set of {operator, value} pairs used to match the Source-IP-Origin-AS.

The operator byte (numeric_op) is encoded as specified in Section 4.2 of [RFC8955]:

    0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
  | e | a |  len  | 0 |lt |gt |eq |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
Figure 1: Numeric Operator (numeric_op)

Where:

The value field contains a 4-octet Autonomous System Number encoded in network byte order:

   0                   1                   2                   3
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
  +---------------------------------------------------------------+
  ~       Source-IP-Origin-AS  (4 octets)                         ~
  +---------------------------------------------------------------+
Figure 2: Source-IP-Origin-AS Value

3.1. Ordering of Components

As defined in [RFC8955], a strict ordering of components MUST be followed to ensure a deterministic comparison of FlowSpec NLRIs.

The Source-IP-Origin-AS component (Type TBD1) MUST be ordered after Type 2 (Source Prefix) and before Type 3 (IP Protocol).

[Note to IANA: The exact numeric order will depend on the assigned Type value.]

3.2. Operational Procedures and Packet Matching Logic

When a BGP speaker receives and installs a FlowSpec route containing the Source-IP-Origin-AS component, the matching process for a transit data packet MUST proceed as follows:

  1. The router extracts the packet's Source IP address.

  2. The router performs a longest-prefix match (LPM) lookup for the Source IP in its local BGP Loc-RIB / FIB to retrieve the associated active BGP route.

  3. The router evaluates the AS_PATH attribute of the retrieved BGP route:

    • The Origin AS is defined as the rightmost AS number in the AS_SEQUENCE segment of the AS_PATH.

    • If the AS_PATH ends with an AS_SET or AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE, the match fails unless all ASes in the set match, or the implementation supports evaluating each AS in the AS_SET against the filter.

  4. If the evaluated Origin AS matches the criterion in the FlowSpec rule, the packet matches this component.

  5. In multi-homing or multipath scenarios where a source prefix is reachable via paths with different Origin ASes, the match MUST succeed if ANY valid active path for the source prefix matches the Origin AS defined in the FlowSpec rule.

If a receiving BGP speaker cannot support this new component type, it MUST follow the error handling and component skipping procedures defined in Section 10 of [RFC8955] and [RFC8956].

4. Use Cases

This section describes how to use this function in a simple scenario. Consider the topology shown in Figure 3. Router R2 in AS64597 receives traffic originating from AS64598 destined for IP Prefix 61. The operator wants to redirect all traffic originating from AS64598 towards Router R3 before forwarding it to IP Prefix 61.

                         +---------+
                         | BGP FS  |
                         | Server  |
                         +----|----+
                              |
                              |
                              +
                               \
                ****************\********  IP Prefix 81
                *                \      *  IP Prefix 82
  IP Prefix 61  *          AS64597\     *  IP Prefix 83
                *                  \    *  IP Prefix 84
   +-------+    *  +---+         +--\+  *   +-------+
   +AS64596+-------+ R1+---------+ R2|------+AS64598+
   +-------+    *  +-+-+\        +---+  */  +-------+
                *        \         |\   /
                *         \        | \ /*  IP Prefix 91
                *          \       |  /\*  IP Prefix 92
                *           \      | /  \  IP Prefix 93
                *            \     |/   *\ IP Prefix 94
                *             \  +-+-+  * \ +-------+
                *              \-+ R3+------+AS64599+
                *                +---+  *   +-------+
                *                       *
                *************************

Figure 3: Traffic Redirection Using FlowSpec

Using the traditional method, ISP AS64597 must inject multiple "Destination Prefix + Source Prefix" FlowSpec rules into Router R2:

+--------------+--------------+-------------------------+
| Destination  | Source Prefix| Action / Next-hop       |
| Prefix       |              |                         |
+--------------+--------------+-------------------------+
| IP Prefix 61 | IP Prefix 81 | Redirect to R3          |
| IP Prefix 61 | IP Prefix 82 | Redirect to R3          |
| IP Prefix 61 | IP Prefix 83 | Redirect to R3          |
| IP Prefix 61 | IP Prefix 84 | Redirect to R3          |
| ...          | ...          | ...                     |
+--------------+--------------+-------------------------+

Figure 4: Traditional FlowSpec Matching

Using the method defined in this draft, ISP AS64597 needs to inject only a single "Destination Prefix + Source IP Origin AS" FlowSpec rule:

+--------------+--------------+-------------------------+
| Destination  | Source IP    | Action / Next-hop       |
| Prefix       | Origin AS    |                         |
+--------------+--------------+-------------------------+
| IP Prefix 61 | AS64598      | Redirect to R3          |
+--------------+--------------+-------------------------+

Figure 5: Source-IP-Origin-AS FlowSpec Matching

This method saves significant TCAM space on network elements, reduces BGP UPDATE messaging load on the control plane, and simplifies operational management when a source AS advertises numerous dynamic prefixes.

5. Security Considerations

In addition to the security considerations in [RFC8955] and [RFC8956], operators MUST be aware of the following:

6. IANA Considerations

IANA is requested to allocate a new component type in the "Flow Spec Component Types" registry defined in [RFC8955]:

+-------+-------------------------------+---------------+
| Type  | Description                   | Reference     |
+-------+-------------------------------+---------------+
| TBD1  | Source-IP-Origin-AS           | This-Draft    |
+-------+-------------------------------+---------------+

7. Contributors

TBD

8. Acknowledgments

TBD

9. References

9.1. Normative References

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC4271]
Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8955]
Loibl, C., Hares, S., Raszuk, R., McPherson, D., and M. Bacher, "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules", RFC 8955, DOI 10.17487/RFC8955, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8955>.
[RFC8956]
Loibl, C., Ed., Raszuk, R., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules for IPv6", RFC 8956, DOI 10.17487/RFC8956, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8956>.

9.2. Informative References

[RFC6811]
Mohapatra, P., Scudder, J., Ward, D., Bush, R., and R. Austein, "BGP Prefix Origin Validation", RFC 6811, DOI 10.17487/RFC6811, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6811>.

Authors' Addresses

Haibo Wang
Huawei
156 Beiqing Road
Beijing
100095
P.R. China
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
Beiqijia Town, Changping District
Beijing
102209
P.R. China
Shunwan Zhuang
Huawei
156 Beiqing Road
Beijing
100095
P.R. China
Jie Dong
Huawei
156 Beiqing Road
Beijing
100095
P.R. China
Yang Huang
Huawei
156 Beiqing Road
Beijing
100095
P.R. China
Tao Qin
Huawei
156 Beiqing Road
Beijing
100095
P.R. China